Health Care in Canada is sent through thirteen provincial and territorial systems of publicly funded health care, informally called Medicare. This was guided by the provisions of Canada's Health Act 1984.
Video Healthcare in Canada
Current status
Government guarantees quality of care through federal standards. The government does not participate in daily care or collects any information about a person's health, which remains confidential between a person and their doctor. Medicare systems based in the province of Canada are cost effective due to their administrative simplicity. In every province, every doctor handles insurance claims against provincial insurance companies. People who access health need not be involved in billing and recovery at all. Private health spending accounts for 30% of healthcare financing. The Canadian Health Act does not cover prescription drugs, home care or long-term care or dental care, which means that most Canadians rely on personal insurance from their employers or governments to pay for these costs. Provinces provide partial coverage for children, those living in poverty and the elderly.
Competitive practices such as ads are kept to a minimum, maximizing the percentage of income directly to care. Fees are paid through funding from income tax. In British Columbia, tax-based financing coupled with a fixed monthly premium is waived or reduced for those with low incomes. There is no deductible on basic health care and very low or no co-pay (additional insurance such as Fair Pharmacare may have a deductible, depending on income). In general, user fees are not permitted by the Canadian Health Act, but doctors may charge a small fee to patients for reasons such as missed appointments, doctor's notes and for recharging recipes made over the phone. Some doctors ask for "annual fees" as part of the comprehensive service package they offer to patients and their families. Such allegations are entirely optional and can only be for unimportant healthcare options.
Benefits and features
Health cards are issued by the Provincial Health Ministry for each individual who enrolls for the program in the province and everyone receives the same level of care. There is no need for various plans as almost all essential basic care is included, including maternity but excluding mental and home health care. The cost of infertility is not covered in provinces other than Quebec, although it is now partly covered in several other provinces. In some provinces, additional private plans are available for those who want private rooms if they are hospitalized. Cosmetic surgery and some forms of elective surgery are not considered essential treatments and are generally not covered. For example, Canada's health insurance plan does not cover non-therapeutic circumcision. This can be paid out-pocket or through private insurance. Health coverage is not affected by job loss or change, health care can not be rejected due to unpaid premiums, and no lifetime limitations or exceptions to pre-existing conditions. The Canadian Health Act considers that important doctors and hospital care are covered by publicly funded systems, but each province has several reasons for determining what counts, and where, how and who should provide the service. The result is that there is wide variation in what is covered throughout the country by public health systems, particularly in more controversial areas, such as obstetric care or autism.
Canada (with the exception of the province of Quebec) is one of the few countries with a universal health system that does not include prescription drug coverage (other countries such as Russia and some former USSR republics although Russia is considering switching to full coverage of many prescription drugs in the near future ). Quebec residents covered by the provincial general prescription drug plan pay an annual premium of $ 0 to $ 660 when they file their Quebec income tax refund. Pharmaceutical drugs are covered by public funds in some provinces for the elderly or the needy, or through personal insurance based on labor or paid for out-of-pocket. Most drug prices are negotiated with suppliers by individual provincial governments to control costs but recently, the Federation Council announced an initiative for specific provinces to work together to create larger purchasing blocks to maximize control of pharmaceutical drug costs. More than 60 percent of prescription drugs are paid for privately in Canada. Family doctors (often known as GPs or GPs in Canada) are selected by individuals. If a patient wishes to see a specialist or is counseled to see a specialist by their doctor, the referral is performed by a GP in the local community. Early prevention and detection treatments are important and annual checks are recommended for everyone.
Statistics
2012 saw a record year for a number of doctors with 75,142. The average gross salary is $ 328,000. From gross amounts, doctors pay taxes, rent, staff salaries, and equipment. Recent reports indicate that Canada may be heading toward the surplus of doctors, although people in rural, remote and northern areas, and some specialties, may still be deprived.
Maps Healthcare in Canada
Public opinion
Canada strongly supports the public health system rather than profiting privately, and a 2009 poll by Nanos Research found 86.2% of Canadians surveyed supported or strongly supported "public solutions to make our public healthcare stronger." A Strategic Advisor survey found 91% of Canadians preferred their health care system rather than a US-style system.
The Harris-Decima 2009 poll found 82% of Canadians preferred their health care system compared to those in the United States.
A 2003 Gallup poll found 25% of Americans either "very" or "somewhat" satisfied with "affordable health care availability in the country", compared to 50% of those in the UK and 57% of Canadians. They are "very dissatisfied" form 44% Americans, 25% of respondents are British, and 17% Canadian. Regarding quality, 48% of Americans, 52% of Canadians, and 42% of British people say they are satisfied.
Economy
Canada has a publicly funded medicare system, with most services provided by the private sector. Each province can opt out, even if it is not currently available. The Canadian system is known as a single paying system, where basic services are provided by private doctors (since 2002 they are allowed to join), with all fees paid by the government at the same rate. Most of the government funds (94%) are from the provincial level. Most family doctors receive a cost per visit. These figures are negotiated between the provincial government and the provincial medical association, usually annually. Pharmaceutical costs are set in the global median by government price controls.
Hospital care is delivered by publicly funded hospitals in Canada. Most public hospitals, each of which is an independent institution established under the provincial Corporation Law, are required by law to operate within their budget. Hospital amalgamation in the 1990s has reduced competition among hospitals. As patient care costs have increased, hospitals are forced to cut costs or reduce services. Applying a pharmacoeconomic perspective to analyzing cost reduction has shown that savings made by individual hospitals result in significant cost increases to the Province.
In 2009, the government funded about 70% of Canadian health care costs. This is slightly below the average OECD public health spending. This covers most of the costs of hospitals and doctors while dental and pharmaceutical fees are paid for by individuals. Half of private health spending comes from private insurance and the remaining half is supplied with off-pocket payments. Under the terms of the Canadian Health Act, public funding is required to pay for necessary medical care, but only if it is delivered at a hospital or by a doctor. There are many variations across provinces where costs such as outside hospital prescription drugs, physical therapy, long-term care, dental care and ambulance services are covered.
Canadian health expenditures (in 1997 dollars) increased annually between 1975 and 2009, from $ 39.7 billion to $ 137.3 billion, or per capita expenditure from $ 1,715 to $ 4089. In 2013 it totaled $ 211 billion, an average of $ 5,988 per person. The figures in the National Health Expenditure Trend, 1975 to 2012, show that the rate of growth is slowing. Simple economic growth and budget deficits have moderating effects. For the third year in a row, growth in health care spending will be less than that in the overall economy. The proportion of Canada's gross domestic product will reach 11.6% in 2012 down from 11.7% in 2011 and an all time high of 11.9% in 2010. Total spending in 2007 is equivalent to 10.1% of gross domestic product which is slightly above average for OECD countries, and below 16.0% of GDP spent in the United States.
In 2009, the largest proportion of this money went to the hospital ($ 51B), followed by drugs ($ 30B), and doctors ($ 26B). The proportion spent for hospitals and physicians declined between 1975 and 2009 while the amount spent on drugs has increased. Of the three largest health care costs, the amount spent on pharmaceuticals is increasing. In 1997, the total price of the drug exceeded the number of doctors. In 1975, the three largest healthcare costs were hospitals ($ 5.5B/44.7%), doctors ($ 1.8B/15.1%), and drugs ($ 1.1B/8.8%) while in 2007, the three largest costs are hospitals ($ 45.4B/28.2%), drugs ($ 26.5B/16.5%), and doctors ($ 21.5B/13.4%).
The cost of health care per capita varies in Canada with Quebec ($ 4,891) and British Columbia ($ 5,254) at the lowest levels and Alberta ($ 6,072) and Newfoundland ($ 5,970) at the highest level. It is also the largest at an extreme age at a cost of $ 17,469 per capita for those older than 80 and $ 8,239 for those who are less than 1 year old compared to $ 3,809 for those between 1 and 64 years old in 2007.
In 2017, the Canadian Health Information Institute reported that health care spending was estimated at $ 242 billion, or 11.5% of Canada's gross domestic product for the year. Total health expenditure per population varies from $ 7,378 in Newfoundland and Labrador to $ 6,321 in British Columbia. Public drug spending increased 4.5% by 2016, largely driven by prescriptions for alpha necrosis factor tumors and hepatitis C drugs.
According to a 2003 article by Lightman, "Delivery of goods in Canada is superior to the American market approach in terms of shipping efficiency." In the US, 13.6 percent of GNP is used for medical care. In contrast, in Canada, only 9.5 percent of GNP is used on the medicare system, "in part because there is no profit incentive for private insurance companies." Lightman also noted that the freight system eliminates most prominent advertising in the US, and low overall administrative costs in the freight forwarding system. Since there are no significant tests and no bad debt problems for doctors under the Canadian in-kind system, the billing and billing costs of doctors are reduced to almost zero.
History
See Medical history in Canada
Government engagement
Various levels of government payments for about 70% of Canadian health care, although this number has declined in recent years. The Constitution Act, 1867 (previously called the British North America Act, 1867, and still known informally as the BNA Act) does not assign responsibility to the federal or provincial government for health care, since it is a minor issue. The law does give provinces responsibility for organizing hospitals, and provinces claim that their general responsibility for local and private affairs includes health care. The federal government feels that the health of the population falls under Peace, Order, and Good Governance as part of its responsibilities. This led to several decades of debate about jurisdiction that was not resolved until the 1930s. Eventually the Justice Committee of the Advisory Board ruled that the administration and delivery of health care were a matter of concern for the province, but that the federal government also had a responsibility to protect the health and wellbeing of the population.
By far the largest government health program is Medicare, which is actually ten provincial programs, such as OHIP in Ontario, which are required to comply with the general guidelines set forth in the federal Canadian Health Act. Almost all government health spending through Medicare, but there are some smaller programs. The federal government directly regulates health to groups such as the military, and federal prison inmates. They also gave concern to the Canadian Mounted Police and Canadian veterans, but these groups mostly use the public system. Prior to 1966, Veterans Affairs Canada had a large health care network, but it was incorporated into a common system with Medicare manufacture. The largest group that the federal government is directly responsible for is First Nations. Indigenous people are the federal and federal government's responsibility to ensure complete coverage of their health needs. Over the past twenty years and although health care guaranteed its right to the First Nation because of many agreements, the Canadian government signed access to First Nation land and resources, the amount of coverage provided by the Federal Government's Unlicensed Health Benefits program has been drastically reduced for optometry, medicine teeth, and drugs. The status of individual First Nations is eligible for a number of visits to dentists and dentists, with limited coverage for eyeglasses, eye examinations, filling, root canals, etc. For most people First Nations using regular hospitals and federal government then fully compensate the provincial government for a fee. The federal government also covers all user fees charged by the province. The federal government maintains a network of clinics and health centers in Native Reserves. At the provincial level, there are also several health programs that are much smaller in addition to Medicare. The greatest of these are the healthcare costs paid by workers' compensation systems. Regardless of federal efforts, health care for First Nations in general has not been considered effective.
Although it is the province's responsibility, substantial healthcare costs have long been funded in part by the federal government. The fee-sharing agreement created by the HIDS Act and extended by the Medical Treatment Act was terminated in 1977 and replaced by the Consisted Program Financing. It provides block transfers to the province, giving them more flexibility but also reducing the federal influence on health systems. In 1996, while facing a large budget shortage, the Liberal federal government combined health transfers with transfers for other social programs to Canada Health and Social Transfer, and overall funding levels were cut. This puts considerable pressure on the provinces, and combined with population aging and the generally high inflation rate in health costs, has caused problems with the system.
Private sector
About 27.6% of Canadian health care is paid through the private sector. These are mostly intended for services not covered or partially covered by Medicare, such as prescription drugs, dentistry, and optometry. About 75% of Canadians have some form of additional private health insurance; many of them accept it through their employers.
The Canadian system is for the most part publicly funded, but most services are provided by private companies. Most doctors do not receive an annual salary, but receive a fee per visit or service. According to Dr. Albert Schumacher, former president of the Canadian Medical Association, estimated that 75 percent of Canadian health care services are privately provided, but are publicly funded.
"Frontline practitioners whether they are generalists or specialists are generally unpaid, they are small hardware stores, the same with radiology laboratories and clinics... The situation we are seeing now is that there are more services around that are not publicly funded but people have to pay for them, or their insurance company.We have some sort of passive privatization. "
"Although there are laws that prohibit or restrict private healthcare in some provinces, they can be changed", according to a report in the New England Journal of Medicine. In June 2005, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled at Chaoulli v. Quebec (the Prosecutor-General) that Quebec's prohibition of private health insurance for medically required service laws violates the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedom, potentially opening the door for private sector participation in the health system. Judges Beverley McLachlin, Jack Major, Michel Bastarache, and Marie Deschamps were found for the majority. "Access to waiting lists is not access to health care," Supreme Court Justice Beverly McLachlin wrote.
Quebec and the federal government asked the high court to delay its decision for 18 months. Less than two months after the initial decision, the court agreed to suspend its decision for 12 months, retroactively until June 9, 2005.
Doctors and medical organizations
Canada, like its North American neighbors, has a doctor-to-practice ratio with a population that is below the OECD average but a higher practice nurse level than the US or OECD average.
Family doctor in Canada earns an average of $ 202,000 per year. Alberta has the highest average salary of around $ 230,000, while Quebec has the lowest average annual salary of $ 165,000, arguably creating an interprovincial competition for doctors and contributing to local shortcomings.
In 1991, Ontario Medical Association agreed to be a closed shop across the province, making the OMA union a monopoly. Critics argue that this action has limited the supply of doctors to ensure the income of its members.
In September 2008, the Ontario Medical Association and the Ontarian government agreed to a new four-year contract that would see doctors receive a 12.25% salary increase. The new agreement is expected to pay an additional $ 1 billion in fare. Referring to the agreement, Ontario Prime Minister Dalton McGuinty said, "One of the things we should do, of course, is to ensure that we are competitive... to attract and keep doctors here in Ontario...".
In December 2008, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada reported a critical shortage of obstetrics and gynecologists. The report states that 1,370 obstetricians are trained in Canada and that number is expected to fall by at least a third in five years. The public asked the government to increase the number of medical school places for obstetrics and gynecologists by 30 percent annually for three years and also recommend rotating the placement of doctors into smaller communities to encourage them to live there.
Each province regulates its medical profession through the College of Physicians and Surgeons, responsible for licensing physicians, setting standards of practice, and investigating and disciplining its members.
National Association of Doctors is called the Canadian Medical Association; it describes its mission as "To serve and unite Canadian doctors and become a national advocate, in partnership with Canadians, to the highest standards of health and health care." Since health care is considered to be under a provincial/territorial jurisdiction, negotiations on behalf of doctors are conducted by provincial associations such as Ontario Medical Association. The views of Canadian doctors have been mixed, especially in their support to enable parallel private financing. The history of Canadian doctors in the development of Medicare has been described by C. David Naylor. Since the issuance of Canada's 1984 Health Act, the CMA itself has been a strong supporter of maintaining a publicly funded system, including lobbying the federal government for increased funding, and being a founding member (and active participant in) Lobby Health Action (HEALING).
However, there are internal disputes. In particular, some provincial medical associations contend to allow for greater personal roles. To some extent, this is a reaction to strong cost control; CIHI estimates that 99% of physician expenditures in Canada come from public sector sources, and doctors - especially those who provide elective procedures that have been squeezed for the operating room time - are well suited to search for alternative sources of income.
One indication of this internal disagreement occurred when Dr. Brian Day of B.C. was elected president of the CMA in August 2007. Today is Canada's largest private hospital owner and vocal supporter of private healthcare enhancement in Canada. The CMA presidency rotates among provinces, with provincial associations choosing a candidate that is generally ratified by the CMA general meeting. The day's election was controversial enough that she was challenged - albeit unsuccessfully - by another doctor. The newspaper story goes on to note that "Day said he never supported the privatization of health care in Canada, and accused his critics of deliberately distorting his position."
Criticism
Gender Gaps in Health Care Due to the fact that men and women are not only socially different but biologically different, the way women receive care for their health is so important. Women tend to visit doctors more often than men for various reasons. The female reproductive system is different from men and besides, women are individuals who carry babies for nine months so the way they undergo their health care is important. About half of the Canadian population is made up of women and hereby stated, "Women receive the majority of health care in Canada and are the major providers of paid and unpaid health care both inside and outside their households."
Women tend to receive health care through Medicare rather than private health insurance because this means they will be able to receive health care without having to worry about the bills. "It's important for women if the cost of health care is covered by public insurance or paid privately because women, on average, earn less than men and face higher levels of poverty." It is not surprising that the worldwide gender gap has been clearly demonstrated but the struggle for equal protection is something worth fighting for. "So far, from the perspective of Canadian women, who have little opportunity to incorporate into these major changes, privatization has reduced their income and job security, making them more supportive at home, and reducing their choices and access to quality care. Health care reform, as it is currently being implemented, is a problem, not a solution for women. "The need for health care reforms designed not only for men but for women is one that needs to be done. Because some women tend to stay at home moms, and are not employed full-time, access to certain health care attributes is taken. "However, since women, as a group, tend not to work full time, they tend to have access to uninsured services like drugs."
In a recent study showing differences between men and women receiving health care in Canada. In certain areas of health care, it indicates the waiting times, related diagnostic tests, and different insurance benefits between men and women. In a recent Canadian study, "Reporting means significantly lower waiting times for men than for women with regard to overall diagnostic testing: for MRI, 70.3 days for women compared with 29.1 days for men." With longer waiting times means higher risk of health complications that are not essential in dealing with health care in an effective way. Overall, improving women's health is one that needs to be addressed because of the gender gap within the country.
Waiting time
Health Canada, a federal department, publishes a series of health care system surveys in Canada based on first-hand experience of the health care system in Canada.
Although life-threatening cases are dealt with promptly, some of the services required are not urgent and patients are seen at the next available appointment at their chosen facility.
The average waiting time for diagnostic services such as MRI and CAT scans is two weeks with 86.4% waiting for less than 90 days. The average waiting time for elective or non-urgent surgery is four weeks with 82.2% waiting for less than 90 days.
According to the conservative think tank, the Fraser Institute, Canada's average waiting time from General Practitioner to specialist is 18.4 weeks (over 4 months) by 2015.
A 2016 study by the US-based Commonwealth Fund found that Canada's waiting time for all service categories ranked either lower or lower down out of the eleven countries surveyed (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand , Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and the United States). Canada's waiting time in emergency services is the longest among the eleven countries, with 29% of Canadians reporting that they waited more than the last four hours when they went to the emergency department. By comparison, the US is equivalent to an average rate of 11%. Canada also has the longest waiting time for specialist appointments, with 56% of all Canadians waiting for more than four weeks. The US, on the other hand, has one of the lowest rates at 24%, well below the 36% average. Canada ranks last in all other categories of waiting times, including the same or subsequent appointments, same day answers from doctors, and elective surgery, except for access to services after hours of only lower Swedish hours. The study also notes that although government investment, improvements in the waiting time of Canada can be ignored when compared to the 2010 survey.
Dr. Brian Day was quoted as saying "This is a country where dogs can get hip replacements in less than a week and where humans can wait two to three years." Day does not provide a source for its claims two to three years. The Canadian Health Coalition has responded briefly to Claim Day, pointing out that "access to veterinary care for animals is based on the ability to pay.The dogs will be subdued if the owner can not pay.Access to care should not be based on ability to pay." The Medicare regional administration in Canada publishes their own waiting time data on the internet. For example, in British Columbia the waiting time for elective pelvic replacement is now slightly under ten weeks. CHC is one of many Canadian groups calling for increased provincial and federal funds for treatment and ending provincial funding cuts as a solution to unacceptable waiting times.
Since 2002, the Canadian government has invested $ 5.5 billion to reduce the waiting time. In April 2007, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced that all ten provinces and three regions would establish a patient waiting time in 2010. Canadians would be guaranteed proper access to health care in at least one of the following priority areas, respectively province: cancer care, hip and knee replacement, heart care, diagnostic imaging, cataract surgery or primary care. The current cultural change towards evidence-based medicine is evolving in Canada with the emergence of organizations such as Canada's Selecting Policy. Such organizations hope to encourage and facilitate doctor-patient communication, reduce unnecessary maintenance in Canada, and therefore hopefully reduce waiting time.
In a 2007 episode of ABC News's <20/20 titled "Sick in America", libertarian John Stossel cites many examples of Canadians who are not getting the health care they need. The conservative Fraser Institute found that the timing of treatment from early referrals by GPs in consultation with specialists for the final treatment, in all specializations and all procedures (emergency, non-urgent, and elective), averaged 17.7 weeks in 2005, the Canadian government Report 2007 on itself.
Counter-criticism: Some longer waiting times can benefit patients
It has been speculated and supported data that the complete elimination of all waiting times is not ideal. When waiting lists appear through a prioritization process based on medical urgency determined by the physician and the risk of the procedure, (in contrast to the patient's ability to pay or profitability for the doctor), waiting lists may be helpful to the patient. It has been postulated that immediate treatment systems can be detrimental for optimal patient outcomes, as unnecessary or unproven surgery may not be easily avoided if all patients are given instant care.
An example is the province of British Columbia in Canada, where, according to the surgeon. Lawrence Burr, 15 heart patients died in 1990 while on the waiting list for heart surgery. According to Robin Hutchinson, senior medical consultant for the Department of Health's heart program, waiting lists are absent and all patients are given quick access to surgery, the expected number of deaths will be 22 due to surgical mortality rates at the time. Hutchison noted that BC Medical Association media campaigns do not refer to these comparative statistics and focus on mortality during waiting operations. Because, ideally, waiting lists prioritize patients at high risk of receiving surgery in the presence of those at lower risk, this helps reduce overall patient mortality. Consequently, patients who are rich or highly insured in a system based on profit or ability to pay (as in the US) can be pushed into operations or other procedures more quickly, with results at a higher risk of morbidity or mortality. This is in addition to a better understood phenomenon in which low-income, uninsured, or uninsured patients feel that their treatment is rejected or delayed, resulting in even worse health care.
Restrictions on privately funded health care
The Canadian Health Act, which specifies requirements to be followed by provincial/territorial health insurance plans if they wish to receive full transfer payments from the federal government, does not allow fees to the insured for insured services (defined as the necessary medical care provided in the hospital or by a doctor). Most provinces have responded through various restrictions on these payments. This is not a private care funded ban; indeed, about 30% of Canadian health expenditures come from private sources, both insurance and out-of-pocket payments. Canadian health legislation does not address shipments. Therefore, private clinics are permitted, subject to provincial/territorial regulations, but they can not charge above the agreed cost schedule unless they are caring for the uninsured (which may include those eligible under car insurance or compensation workers, other than non-Canadians), or provide uninsured services. This provision has become controversial among those seeking a greater role for private funding.
In 2006, the British Columbia Government threatened to close a private clinic because it plans to begin receiving personal payments from patients. Since 2008, Dr. Brain Day has sued the British Columbia government on the grounds that the Canadian Health Act is unconstitutional. In 2016, the Government of Quebec is charged with issuing Bill 20, which allows and arranges additional fees.
Cross-border health care
The border between Canada and the United States is a borderline for medical tourism, in which residents of a country travel elsewhere to seek more accessible or affordable health care.
Canadians who visit the US to receive health care
Some Canadians travel to the United States for treatment. A study by Barer et al., Shows that the majority of Canadians seeking health care in the US already exist for other reasons, including business or leisure travel. Few seek treatment in the US for reasons of confidentiality, including abortion, mental illness, substance abuse, and other issues they may not want to disclose to their local doctor, family, or employer.
Canadian citizens offer free maintenance in the US paid by the Canadian government sometimes deny it. In 1990, the British Columbia Medical Association put up a radio ad, asking, "How long will you line up in the bank before you get really upset? Five minutes? Ten minutes? What if you need heart surgery?" Following this, the government responded, as summarized by Robin Hutchinson, senior medical consultant for the heart health care program. Although medically questionable from the heart bypass for milder cases of chest pain and follow-up studies that show heart bypass recipients are 25-40% more likely to be relieved of chest pain than people who keep taking heart medications, "public outrage" follows those ads leading the government to take action:
"We have an agreement with the University of Washington in Seattle," Hutchinson said. To take 50 cases of bypass at $ 18,000 per head, almost $ 3,000 higher than the cost in Vancouver, with all the money [paid by] the province. theory, the Seattle operation promised to take the heat from the Department of Health until the fourth heart operation unit opened on the outskirts of Vancouver New Westminster. If the first batch of Seattle passes through smoothly.. then the government plans to buy three or four more blocks 50. But four weeks after it announced the plan, health administrators must admit that they are confused. "Up until now... we've had nine people signing up, the opposition party, the press, everyone is making a big smell about our waiting list, and we're just [nine] people registering!" The surgeons ask their patients and they say, "I would rather wait ", We think we can get about two hundred and fifty people in Seattle.. but if nobody wants to go to Seattle, we're stuck, '".
An analysis using data from the 1996-1997 National Population Health Survey (NPHS - a large survey representative of the non-institutionalized Canadian population, including 17,276 Canadians) reported that 0.5% sought medical care in the US in the previous year. Of this amount, less than a quarter have traveled to the US explicitly to get the treatment. This is supported by additional analysis conducted by the Americans, using structured telephone surveys from all clinical facilities of outpatient care located in the heavily populated urban US corridor that borders with Canada and discharge data for 1994-1998 from major border countries , and contact key informants in each of the US News and World Report's "Best American Hospitals" to inquire about the number of Canadians seen in inpatient and outpatient settings. The authors marked this level of medical travel as "virtually undetectable relative to the use of home care by Canadians" and that the results "do not support the widespread perception that Canadian residents sought extensive treatment in the United States." A separate private-released report instead of a peer-reviewed journal by the conservative think tank Fraser Institute found that the percentage of Canadian patients traveling overseas to receive non-emergency medical care was 1.1% by 2014, and 0, 9% in 2013, with Great Britain Colombia is the province with the highest proportion of people traveling that way.
Some Canadian politicians have traveled to the United States for treatment, regarded as diverse as ironic or cynical. Prime Minister Jean ChrÃÆ' © tien went to the Mayo Clinic twice in 1999 for medical treatment. ChrÃÆ'Â © tien allegedly kept the visit a secret, with one incident during an openly announced ski trip to Vancouver. Canadian Liberal MP Belinda Stronach went to the United States for breast cancer surgery in June 2007. Stronach's spokesman, Greg MacEachern, was quoted in an article as saying that the US is the best place to perform such an operation. Stronach paid for the operation from his own pocket. Prior to this incident, Stronach had stated in an interview that he was opposed to two-tier health care. When Robert Bourassa, the prime minister of Quebec, needed cancer treatment, he went to the United States to get it. In 2010, Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams traveled to the US for heart surgery.
In 2007, it was reported that Canada sent a number of pregnant women to the US to give birth. In 2007 a woman from Calgary who was pregnant with four twins was sent to Great Falls, Montana to give birth. An article about this incident states there is no Canadian hospital with enough neo-natal intensive beds to accommodate a very rare fourfold birth.
A January 19, 2008 article in The Globe and Mail states, "More than 150 critically ill Canadians - many with life - threatening cerebral haemorrhages - have been rushed to the United States since spring 2006 because they can not get intensive care beds here Before patients with internal or external bleeding have been taken through the doors of the US operating room, some have languished for eight hours in the Canadian emergency ward while healthcare workers rush to seek care. "
In 2005 Shona Holmes of Waterdown, Ontario, went to the Mayo Clinic after deciding she could not wait for an appointment with a specialist through Ontario's health care system. He has marked his condition as an emergency, saying he lost his vision, and described his condition as a life-threatening brain cancer. OHIP does not reimburse medical expenses. In 2007 he joined the lawsuit to force the Ontario government to replace patients who felt they had to travel outside of Canada for life-saving medical treatment on time. In July 2009, Holmes agreed to appear in television commercials broadcast in the United States warning Americans about the dangers of adopting a Canadian-style health care system. After his ad appeared critics pointed out the discrepancies in his story, including that Rathke's cleft, his condition, was not a form of cancer, and not life-threatening. In fact, the mortality rate for patients with Rathke's cleft is zero percent.
Americans visit Canada to receive health care
Some US citizens travel to Canada for health care-related reasons. These reasons often involve looking for lower costs.
Many US citizens buy prescription drugs from Canada, either through the Internet or by traveling there to buy them directly, as prescription drug prices in Canada are much lower than the price of prescription drugs in the United States; cross-border purchases are estimated at $ 1 billion annually.
Since medical marijuana is legal in Canada but is illegal in most of the US, many Americans with cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, and glaucoma have gone to Canada for medical treatment. One was Steve Kubby, the 1998 Libertarian Party candidate for the governor of California, who suffered from adrenal cancer. Recent legal changes such as Proposition 215 can reduce this type of medical tourism only from California.
Restricted coverage
- Limited coverage for mental health
The Canadian Health Act includes the services of a psychiatrist, medical doctor with additional training in psychiatry. In Canada, psychiatrists tend to focus on the treatment of mental illness with drugs. However, the Canadian Health Law excludes care provided in "hospitals or institutions primarily for mental disorders." Some institutional care is provided by the province. The Canadian Health Act does not cover treatment by a psychologist or psychotherapist unless the practitioner is also a medical doctor. Tax on Goods and Services or Sales Tax Aligned (depending on province) applies to psychotherapist services. Some coverage for mental health care and substance abuse treatments may be available under other government programs. For example, in Alberta, the province provides funds for mental health care through Alberta Health Services. Most or all provinces and regions offer rehabilitation of government-funded drug and alcohol dependence, although waiting lists may exist. Medical costs by psychologists or psychotherapists in Canada have been cited as contributing factors in high rates of suicide among first responders such as police officers, EMTs and paramedics. According to the CBC report, some police forces "offer a benefit plan that covers only a few sessions with community psychologists, forcing those seeking help to join a long waiting list to seek free psychiatric help."
Limited Coverage for Mouth Health
Oral health care is essential in a person's life and is necessary for the overall quality and health of one's self. "Although dental disease is usually not life-threatening, it tends to be seen in public health burners, and based on the various metrics we can state for sure that Canada is one of the world leaders when it comes to the overall health of its citizens." Canadian dental care may have more positive than any other country but still need work. Having said this, recent dental health focus in Canada has been found to be one more problem than just benefits. "Equity in the use of dental care has recently become increasingly well-known as a health policy issue in Canada and in other OECD countries." It is said that among OECD countries Canada ranks second to last in the oral health financing department. Those in need of dental care are usually responsible for finances and some may benefit from certain actions such as coverage available through employment, under a provincial plan, or a private dental plan. "Unlike the national health insurance system, dental care in Canada is almost completely privately funded, with about 60% dental care being paid through labor-based insurance, and 35% through out-of-pocket expenses [7,8] Of about 5% of the remaining publicly funded care, largely focusing on socially marginalized groups (eg low-income and adult children), and supported by various levels of government dependent on the insured group. [9] "It is true that compared to the examination primary care, dental checkup is very dependent on the ability of people who can afford the cost. When looking at research conducted in Quebec and Ontario cities some interesting facts are seen. For example, research in Quebec shows that there is a strong relationship between dental services and socioeconomic factors of income and education whereas in Ontario older adults rely heavily on dental insurance with visits to dentists. "According to the National Public Health Service in 1996/1997, it shows the vast differences in people in different classes, about half of Canadians aged 15 and over (53%) report having dental insurance (Table 1). Coverage tends to be highest among middle-aged people.At older age, that number declines, and only one-fifth of the 65 or more (21%) age groups are covered. "Attributes that may contribute to this outcome are household income, employment , and education. People who are in the middle class can be covered through the benefits of their work while the older individual may not be due to the fact of retirement.
- Limited coverage for Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy and Massage Therapy
Coverage for services by physiotherapists, occupational therapists (also known as OT) and Registered Massage Therapists (RMT) varies by province. For example, in Ontario the provincial health plan, OHIP, did not include physiotherapy after hospital discharge and occupational therapy but did not include massage therapy. To be eligible for coverage for physiotherapy in Ontario, the insured individual must have been discharged as an inpatient in hospital after an overnight stay and requires physiotherapy for any condition, illness or injury where he or she is hospitalized, or aged 19 or younger or age 65 or older.
- Limited coverage for genital change operations
By 2014, the vast majority, but not all provinces and regions provide coverage for sex change operations (also known as sex surgery) and other treatments for gender disforia. In Ontario, genital change operations are only insured when prior approval has been obtained from the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. There is no minimum age requirement for sex change operation that must be met for OHIP to approve funding. The responsibility for determining whether a patient is able to approve treatment is from the care provider.
- Limited coverage for Assistive Devices
There are many differences in coverage for a variety of tools such as wheelchairs and breathing apparatus in Canada. Ontario, which has one of the most generous programs, pays 75% of the cost for registered equipment and supplies for persons with disabilities who require such equipment or equipment for six months or more. This program has no age or earnings restrictions. As with other health coverage, veterans and others covered by the federal program are not eligible under the provincial program. Only certain types of equipment and supplies are covered, and in the category only approved equipment models from approved vendors are covered, and the vendor may not charge more than the specified price set by the government.
Coverage for Elderly
As we get older, the need for care tends to be stronger and the need for a comprehensive health care plan increases. Since the Canadas' people are based from the federal government as well as the provincial government, both need to work together to create a useful health care plan. There are plans where one, 65 years or older, can apply to make sure they are covered. These include: Old Age Guarantee (OAS), Guaranteed Revenue Guarantee (GIS), Alimony and, Canada Retirement Plan (CPP). OAS is one in which a resident who has lived in Canada for 10 years or more and age 65 or older may apply. Those who have received benefits from the OAS and have a low income can then apply for GIS. If a person has received a GIS, their spouse between the ages of 60-64 may apply for Benefits. Moving together, those in the workforce are likely to set aside money for the Canadian Retirement Plan (CPP) by the time they reach the age of 65. CPP is basically a social insurance program that prepares individuals for retirement. For those who earn CPP, they benefit from a payment plan for things like retirement, disability, child support, and more. "You must apply for OAS, GIS, Allowances, CPP and other federal programs.You will not receive them automatically." Despite this lucrative plan, the need for a better plan of action for the elderly applies. Of the approximately 39 million people in Canada, about 6 million people are made up of seniors. "Given this challenge, it is not surprising that nine out of ten (90%) Canadians agree that Canada needs a national senior strategy to meet its needs throughout the full course of care." To ensure maximum coverage of parents, some things need to be set. For starters, have a shorter waiting time for these seniors. As we get older, more caution is needed to ensure a healthy body and lifestyle and waiting time can dampen this. Next, have a specialist who is knowledgeable with dealing with the elderly in a gentle and very complete manner. "Restrictions on government funding have limited access to care - waiting lists are routine, and Canada increasingly has difficulty accessing family physician services, which can not meet the demands and expectations of patients." This puts pressure on the seniors and the need to make sure everyone is treated right is important after saying that Canada is known to 'not leave Canada behind'. And lastly, having sustainable care for these elders is vital in ensuring the best health care available to those in need. It states that individuals aged 55-64 years, "Over half (55 percent) have savings representing less than a year of resources they need to complete government programs like OAS/GIS and CPP/QPP and less than 20 per cent have enough savings to support the additional resources needed for at least five years. "With this said, to ensure the coverage of all seniors, the extension of public policy is urgently needed. And to reiterate the federal government as well as the provincial government must work together to create an enhanced opportunity for these people.
Portability and residency requirements of province
The Canadian Health Act defines an insured person as a resident of a province. The law defines a resident as: "a person legally entitled to be or reside in Canada who makes his home and is usually present in the province, but excludes a tourist, temporary or visitor to the province." When traveling in Canada, a Canadian health card from a province or region of origin is accepted for hospital and doctor services. This portability is implemented through a series of bilateral reciprocal billing agreements between provinces and regions for hospital and physician services.
Each province has residency and physical attendance requirements to qualify for health care coverage. For example, to qualify for coverage in Ontario, with certain exceptions, a person must be physically present in Ontario for 153 days within a specified 12 month period. Most provinces require 183 days of physical presence within a specified 12 month period. Exceptions may be made to a mobile worker, if an individual can provide documentation from his supervisor who verifies that the individual's work requires frequent travel in and out of the province. Transients, self-employed traveling workers (eg agricultural workers) who move from province to province several times a year, and retired or unemployed people who move from one province to another (eg living with relatives, or living in recreational vehicles) may find themselves ineligible for health coverage in any province or region, even if they are Canadian citizens or physically landed immigrants present in Canada 365 days a year. "Snowbirds" (Canadians who winter in warm climates) and other Canadians who are outside their province or region of origin for a total of more than 183 days in a period of twelve months lose all coverage. A three-month waiting period is usually applied before coverage is recovered after loss of coverage. Students who attend universities or colleges outside their home province are generally covered by health insurance programs from their home province, however, "Usually this coverage (while outside the province but in Canada) is only for doctors and hospital services only." The Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, for example, states, "Therefore, when traveling outside Ontario but in Canada, the ministry recommends that you obtain additional private health insurance for non-doctors/non-hospital services." Such services may include prescription drugs, or air and ambulance services that may be covered in a person's home province.
Comparison with other countries
Canada's health care system is often compared to the US system. The US system spends the most in the world per capita, and is ranked 37th in the world by the World Health Organization in 2000, while the Canadian health system is ranked 30th. The relatively low WHO Canada ranking has been criticized by some for selecting ranking criteria and statistical methods, and WHO is currently revising its methodology and holding new ratings until the topic is addressed.
Canada spends about 10.0% of GDP on health care in 2006, more than one percentage point higher than the 8.9% average in OECD countries. According to the Canadian Institute for Health Information, spending is expected to reach $ 160 billion, or 10.6% of GDP, in 2007. This means $ 4,867 per person.
In a sample of 13 developed countries, Canada was the tenth population in weightless drug usage in 14 classes in 2009 and sixth in 2013. The medications studied were selected based on the fact that the conditions treated had high incidence, prevalence and/or death, due to morbidity significant long-term and high spending rate and significant development in prevention or treatment has been done in the last 10 years. The study noted considerable difficulties in cross-border comparison of drug use.
Most health statistics in Canada are at or above the G8 average. The direct comparison of health statistics between countries is complex. The OECD collects comparative statistics, and has published a brief country profile.
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments